Showing posts with label interdependence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label interdependence. Show all posts

Sunday, April 27, 2014

A Christian View of Disability

I am closely related to someone who suffered from a disability and from immense mental agony due to the popular misconception of disability and the resulting stigma. Also I have very close friends who suffer from various disabilities, and I have friends who suffer due to their relatives' disabilities. This is what inspired me to take a close look at the question of disability. 

The Popular Paradigm of Disability
It has been widely believed that while most of the people are able, a few people are disabled.The term disabled often refers to the physically disabled ones such as the blind, the deaf, and the lame. Chronic illnesses such as heart disease and diabetes are also sometimes seen as disabilities. Chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia are often seen as worse than disabilities. They were seen as demon possession in Jesus' world. 

Those people who see themselves as able have diverse attitudes to people with disabilities. In many societies people with disabilities are ignored and are left to their fate. The civilized societies identify the people with disabilities and work out ways to help them.  Close friends and family often care for people with disabilities. A few people often develop a hostile attitude to people with disabilities. The Pharisees in the gospels have such an attitude. People with disabilities are often seen as parasites, depending on those people who are able. As a result, people with disabilities have low self-esteem. They look upon themselves as cursed and unfortunate.

When people with visible disabilities are classified into a group, and are labeled as disabled people, a social disability is imposed on them in addition to their primary disability. This secondary imposed social disability is much more severe and worse than their primary disability. If only a few are disabled, they feel shame about their disability, and they will be looked down upon by others. When a class of people is created based on their disability, and when they are looked down upon by the others, a secondary social disability (stigma) is added on top of their original one. Most often such a social stigma is much more severe and hard to bear than the original disabilities.

Metropolitan Paulos Mar Gregorios (1997), writing his autobiography at the age of 70, narrates his most painful experience as a teenager—his mother becoming mentally ill. Some days, his mother would go and stand on the roadside verandah of their house, doing all kinds of pranks and talking all kinds of nonsense particularly when the road was full of children going to school. They were his classmates and schoolmates, and he was filled with shame that they watched his mother in this condition.

Reading about this heartbreaking story, the one question that may surface in our mind is this: Why does an illness or a disability cause shame? Why does a disabled person feel inferior, and why do others look down upon them?

Current Attempts to Face the Problem
I made a quick examination of the current studies and views of disability. Deborah Creamer (2006) provides a summary of the prominent theological models of disability -- the Accessible God by Jennie Weiss Block, the Inclusive God by Kathy Black, and the Disabled God by Nancy Eiesland. These models suggest alternative models of God so that the people of disability might be included in the mainstream society. I feel sympathy for their attempts to develop a model of God that can empower the disabled people. This reminds me of the the feminists who claim that God is a female, and the Blacks who claim that God is black. If the disabled people believe that God is disabled, they get convinced that God is on their side, and this serves to boost their self esteem. However, the basis to prove that God is disabled is not strong enough, and this belief cannot be sustained for long. These views serves to revolt against the current popular views, but a satisfactory alternative view is yet to be developed.

The Christian Paradigm of Disability
Failing to find a satisfactory approach in the current studies, I turn to my own religious tradition-- the eastern Orthodox Christian tradition. Putting together the insights, a very satisfactory view of disability can be derived. 

We will proceed by asking the basic questions: What is disability? Who are disabled? What causes it? Pursuing these questions, we will distinguish between a surface view of disability and a deeper view of disability. The surface view is readily visible without any effort, but the deeper view comes to sight only with some effort. While most of the people hold the surface view, a few people hold the deeper view. Thus the surface view is more popular and widely held and acceptable than the deeper view. These two views are often contradictory to each other. Here an effort is made to expose the fallacy of the surface view of disability and to bring a deeper view to sight.

The popular view of disability that a few people are disabled and the rest are fully able is a surface view that is readily visible without any effort. This view limits disability to physical disabilities, chronic illnesses, and perhaps also to a few chronic debilitating mental illnesses. Taking a closer look, we realize that physical disability is only one of the various kinds of disabilities. It seems that our disabilities are more mental than physical. It is common knowledge that a human being is made of body and mind, which are like the hardware and software of a computer. The software is the real stuff of a computer. The hardware serves as a body to the software by making it accessible to our senses. This is true about the human mind and body too. The body is simply an expression of the mind. To use another metaphor, the body is a vehicle for the mind just like we use a car. The mind, which is invisible, becomes visible through the body. The disabilities of the body are easy to detect and identify, but the disabilities of the mind are not so easy to detect or identify. A human mind has so many different parts and departments. Mental abilities may be broadly classified into the abilities to think, remember, imagine, feel, will, be aware, and pay attention. A mental disability may refer to the disability of any one of those parts. Mental disabilities are much more complex and much more debilitating than physical ones. Mental disabilities include not only schizophrenia and bipolar disorder but also all the disabilities of the various aspects of human mind.

There are also social disabilities and economic disability. Those with economic disability are usually called poor, and they have a lack or shortage of the basic necessities of life-- food, clothing, and shelter. Social disabilities include disabilities imposed on people based on their race, color, gender, nationality etc.

Some of the disabilities are very much visible, but there are many more that are not that visible. Mental disabilities are not as visible as the physical ones. The surface view sees only the visible disabilities, but a deeper view sees the invisible disabilities as well. The term disability in its narrow meaning refers to the visible disabilities. But in its wider meaning, it refers to all kinds of disabilities. 
There was a well-known poet in Kerala called Kunjan Nambiar. He sang that out of one hundred thousand (lakh) people there would be only one or two without any defects or disabilities.

Laksham manushar koodumbol athil
Lakshanamothavar onno rando


He was countering the popular notion that the majority are able and only a few are disabled. He turned it around and argued that the majority are disabled, and only a few are fully able without any defects or disabilities. The meaning of the term disability was limited by him to the physical disabilities. With the wider meaning of disability, that includes mental, social and economic disabilities, Kunjan Nambiar will have to modify his lines as follows: 

Laksham manushar koodumbol athil
Lakshanamothavar ille illa


There is no human being without some sort of defects or disabilities. 

It seems that Jesus Christ held the view that all people in the world are disabled. All people are disabled because God alone is perfect and free from any defects or disabilities. Christianity affirms that God alone is almighty (omnipotent), which means that God alone has all the abilities. No human being can claim to have all the possible abilities. This Christian affirmation also implies that all beings other than God receive their abilities from God. As the church fathers assert, no affirmative statement can be true about God. Thus the statement "God is almighty" does not give us an objective description of God. This Kataphatic (positive) statement must be true about all beings other than God.

If only a few people are disabled, it is natural to assume that their disability was caused by some reason specific to them. It was commonly believed in Jesus’ world that disability is a curse, and it is caused by sins. Jesus acknowledged the connection between sin and disability, but contrary to the popular notion, Jesus held that all people are sinners, and God alone is without any sins. If it is human to err, it is human to be disabled as well. In a conversation with his disciples in the context of healing a blind person, Jesus acknowledged that his blindness was not caused specifically by the sin of anyone in particular.

St. Paul speaks about the gifts of the holy spirit. If I have a certain ability, it has been given to me by the Holy spirit of God, and so I can't feel superior because of it. An ability is given to me for the common good; not just for my own good. This idea affirms that all the abilities of all the people in the world are originally from God, and no one has any ability in him/herself.

If all people are disabled, it would be senseless to classify people into disabled and able. However, since the disability of all people are not equally visible, we may classify people into visibly disabled and invisibly disabled.

The Christian Paradigm as a Solution to the Imposed Social Disability
The story of Jesus cleaning the temple at Jerusalem is meaningful in this context. Jesus expected the temple to be a house of God, but he found it to be a den of robbers. Once he had the robbers out, the people who truly belonged there came in. Matthew tells us that the blind and the lame came into the temple to the presence of Jesus. When the robbers were inside they were outside. Once the robbers were out, they could come inside the House of God. (Matthew 21:12-15) We see two different approaches and attitudes toward disabilities in this story. The blind and the lame were marginalized in that society, and Jesus brought them to the mainstream. All the disabled people were social outcasts in Jesus’ world. It was believed that they were cursed of God because of the sins committed by their forefathers. They were seen as good-for-nothing people. They were considered less human than others. They were haunted by shame, which was strong enough to make them take their own life. When someone takes away his/her own life in such a situation, it is really a murder committed by the community around him/her. Jesus’ view of disability was radically different from the popular view. The popular view of disability was very negative, dishonest, naïve, and unhealthy, and in the place of that, Jesus developed a view which is positive, honest, informed, and healthy.

This situation is very similar to our world today. We have a market economy in our world. Only those who keep on buying and selling have a place in our world. The disabled ones are looked down upon as a burden to the earth. In place of this market-like world we need a home-like world-- a world in which all people feel at home and feel cared for and  supported.

The cause of the original (natural) disabilities is not our concern here. Let us leave the question to the experts in those fields. Here we are concerned about the secondary disability-- a man-made social disability (stigma). A negative approach to the original disabilities is the cause of the secondary disability. People often see the natural disabilities as a curse. Such a negative view imposes a massive social disability on the naturally disabled people.

We may not be able to do much about the natural disabilities, but we will be able to overcome fully the man-made social stigma. The man-made stigma is caused by a misunderstanding, and it can be rooted out by the right understanding. That only a few people in the world are disabled, and the rest are fully able is a misunderstanding. That all people in the world are disabled is the right understanding.  

The understanding that God is the only one with all the abilities has the power to root out this man-made disability imposed on the disabled people. Once we realize that all people are disabled, we can be fully honest about our disabilities. We don’t need to hide our disabilities or feel shame about them. No one will look down upon others for their disabilities. We need to identify what exactly our disabilities are so that we can be very careful in situations that involve our disabilities. We also need to identify our own abilities so that we can make the maximum use of them to serve others. We can stand together as communities so that we can help each other with our disabilities. There is a well-known story of a blind man and a lame man living together. The blind man carries the lame man around. The eyes of one become useful for both and the legs of one become useful for both. Thus living together in a community, we can overcome our disabilities to a great extent.

If only a few people are disabled, they will have a parasitic relationship with the others. But if all people are disabled, all people will have a symbiotic relationship to one another. A symbiotic relationship is beneficial to both parties; a parasitic relationship is beneficial to the parasite, but harmful to the host.  

While children grow up, they need to identify their abilities and disabilities with the help of their parents, teachers and other adults. They will need help from career counselors to choose a means of living according to their abilities and disabilities. Careers need to be chosen according to their abilities and disabilities, not according to their social status or the status of the careers. They need to learn to develop symbiotic relationships in their social life.

In spite of all the inconvenience and sufferings due to our disabilities, they give us the opportunity to reach higher and evolve further in some other abilities. A disability can be the catalyst for an ability. In this sense, disabilities are not a curse but a blessing. It is up to us to make them a curse or a blessing.

A human body was the model of an ideal community for Paul. Each organ in the body has its abilities and disabilities. The eyes can see, but cannot do anything else. The ears have the ability to hear, but are disabled in every other way. We all have our abilities and disabilities. Standing alone, we are all disabled. If we stand together as a community, as organs of a body, we can move on successfully supporting one another. Community life compensates for our disabilities to a great extent.
A family was the model of an ideal community for Jesus. In a family no one is marginalized; everyone supports each other. In a den of robbers, some people are marginalized in the name of their disabilities. But in the house of God, all people are valued. Christianity began as a community of disabled people supporting one another. Eventually it became very much other-worldly and failed to provide any meaningful guidance to human life in the present world. Christianity needs to regain its original meaning and create a new meaningful foundation for a new civilization. Our world with its market economy is currently a den of robbers, where a lot of people are marginalized. It needs to become the house of God, in which we all people support and take care of one another.

Conclusion
The primary disabilities need to be distinguished from the secondary social disability imposed on the disabled people. The Christian paradigm that all people are disabled can effectively deal with this problem. It not only saves people from the imposed social disability but also helps them to live in communities with a symbiotic relationship overcoming even the primary disabilities to a great extent.

References
Creamer, Deborah. (2006). Theological Accessibility: The Contribution of Disability, Disability Studies Quarterly, Volume 26, No. 4.
Gregorios, Paulos. (1997). Love's Freedom The Grand Mystery: A Spiritual Auto-Biography. Kottayam: Mar Gregorios Foundation.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Holy Art Thou, All-Owning

Human community is organized into hierarchical layers called classes based on the amount of wealth they own. The more wealth you own, you belong to a higher class, and the less wealth you own, you belong to a lower class. Class discrimination is the most common, and probably the worst kind. The belief that God is all-owning has the power to break class discrimination. What follows is an explanation of how this is possible.
 
If the trisagion is expanded further, an affirmation like "Holy art thou all-owning" may be added. The idea that God is all-owning can be seen throughout the Bible. Here are a few examples:
  • To the LORD your God belong the heavens, even the highest heavens, the earth and everything in it. Deuteronomy 10:14 
  • For everything in heaven and earth is yours. Yours, O LORD, is the kingdom; you are exalted as head over all. 1 Chronicles 29:11
  • 'The silver is mine and the gold is mine,' declares the LORD Almighty. Haggai 2:8.
  • The earth is the Lord's, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it. Psalms 24:1
  • The world is mine, and all that is in it. Psalm 50:12
That God owns everything is not a descriptive statement about God. It simply means that whoever other than God doesn't own anything. If God is the real owner, human beings cannot be owners; they can only be tenants. The land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants. (Leviticus 25:23). God alone is rich. All people are really poor, for they own nothing. Whatever wealth in our possession has originally come from God. It has been given to us to be taken care of and to be used for common good. This is a revolutionary idea that can root out the class difference.

All over the world, people are divided into classes, such as upper, middle, and lower. If nobody owns anything, there cannot be any class difference. James speaks about the sin of discriminating between the rich and the poor. (James 2). Someone wearing fine clothes is respected, but someone with poor clothes is not. The value of human beings is measured according to the wealth in their possession. What a shame! Also people often feel inferior or superior to others based on class difference.

In our everyday life we speak about the rich and the poor. However, they are relative terms, for there is not any clear dividing line between them. A rich person in one context may be poor in another context. The same person may be rich from someone's perspective, but may be poor from someone else's perspective. Someone who owns one million is rich for someone who owns a hundred thousand, but the same person will look poor to someone who owns ten million.

Jesus took a firm stand against discriminating between the rich and the poor. If God is the owner, all people must be poor. But unfortunately, only a few people realize this. Those few people are called the poor in spirit in Matthew's Gospel. "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven." (Mat. 5:3) Regardless of the amount of wealth in their hands, they are still poor in spirit. Job was poor in spirit, which makes him say, "Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked I will depart. The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away.” (Job 1:21) However his wife thought that whatever wealth they had in their hands truly belonged to them. That is why when they lost the wealth, she wanted Job to curse God and commit suicide. 

Thus Jesus did not classify people into rich and poor. However, he classified people into two based on another standard: Those who realize that all people are poor, and those who think that only some are poor. There is a well-known story of a rich man and Lazarus told by Jesus. (Luke 16) Lazarus goes to heaven and the rich man goes to hell. Why? Was is it because the rich man was rich and Lazarus was poor? If so, we will have to conclude that all the rich people will go to hell and all the poor people will go to heaven? The rich man lived as if he was the true owner of his wealth. He did not realize that God was the true owner, and that he was merely a steward. He believed that he was rich because he was blessed by God, and Lazarus was poor for being cursed by God. Lazarus, however, realized that God is the true owner of everything, and so all people in the world are poor. 

After the time of Jesus, his disciples gathered in Jerusalem, and formed a community in which the individual members did not have any private property. They put their wealth together and made it a common property. They knew that they were really poor, for God owned everything. They even called themselves the poor.  (Acts 2:44-46). Because they hoped for Christ's quick return, they didn't engage in any activity for creating wealth. Thus in the long run, they suffered from a shortage of resources, and we read about Paul making collections for them from the communities in other places.  

There have been monastic communities in the history of Christianity. Poverty is one of the monastic vows. It is a vow of the individual members of the monastic community, not a vow of the community itself. Here poverty doesn't mean not having enough of the basic necessities. It simply means that there is nothing in private ownership. No one in the community has his/her own private property. Everything is held in common. A monastic community is a model community that sets an example for the rest of the human community. The entire humankind may not be able to live like a monastic community. However, humankind must try its best to apply the ideal of common ownership as much as possible. 

In very ancient time, when there were very few people, there was nothing private. They felt like a part of the nature along with the plants and animals. Later when the number of people increased, there was more and more competition for resources, they began to claim ownership of land, and they began to transfer the ownership to their descendants. Even today, the resources like air, rain, ocean, and sunlight are not privatized; they remain common. Roads, parks, lakes, and forests are owned in common by communities. Thus we have developed a life style in which we have both private and public properties.

Joint Responsibility for Commonly Owned Facilities
While living in the United States, I noticed that people feel a joint responsibility to appropriately maintain the commonly-owned facilities. Joint ownership is clearly visible in all the commonly- owned places and institutions. People in general don't litter public places. People in general feel "our" nation, "our" government, and "our" laws. They tend to follow laws willingly rather than break them. They do not rebel against the government unnecessarily. Even if there is a ruling party and an opposing party, their competition with each other always remains healthy and decent. Either of the parties wouldn't do anything that jeopardizes the wellbeing of the nation or of the people. Corruption and bribing are unheard of.

Living in India, I have noticed that people in general don't have a sense of joint responsibility for public places or public institutions. People in general don't feel "our" government, or "our" laws, or "our" nation, or "our" roads. They don't feel responsible for maintaining public places neat; many of them even litter in public places. Corruption and bribing seem to be the general rule. There are so many political parties constantly in competition to get into and stay in positions of power. For many of the members of those parties, it is an opportunity to climb up the ladder of financial freedom rather than an opportunity to serve the people or the nation. In India you can see world's best houses equipped with world's best appliances. But alas, the roads, that are publicly owned, are the world's worst. The houses are made and maintained well because their owners have a sense of ownership and they feel responsible to maintain them. Unfortunately, people do not feel a sense of common ownership for the roads or other public places and institutions. When they want to rebel against something, they express their rebellion by destroying some publicly owned things-- they burn some public buses or break some public buildings or create some obstructions in the public roads.  How would they engage in such destruction if they had any sense of ownership! 

I don't mean that America is a heaven. America has an economic system that may not be healthy in the long run, and so others may not copy. Unfortunately India seems to be slowly copying their economic system instead of developing one of our own. Secularism, which is based on naive realism, seems to be the dominant religion in America. This is a godless and materialistic philosophy, which believes that nothing exists beyond human perception. Unfortunately, this religion is slowly running its roots deeper in Indian soil too. I wonder if this western secularism is slowly replacing the secularism in India, which gives equal importance to all the traditional religions. Thus there are things in America that we, in India, should not copy. However, the one thing we need to copy is their sense of joint responsibility about what is jointly owned.

Community Economy
Traditionally we have had throughout the world a community economy in which its members depend on one another. No individual is an island in such an economy. Each and everyone serves everyone else and he/she in turn is supported by everyone else. No one feels insecure in such an economy, for when you are in need, others will be there to support you. Today, it seems, all over the world, we are slowly moving away from such a community economy toward an individualistic one, in which we are supposed to be fully self-dependent. We are not supposed to be interdependent. We are responsible only for ourselves, and if we help someone else, it is out of charity, not out of responsibility. Too much emphasis on the individual responsibility seems to be the reason for such a development. Standing on our own feet without mutual support causes a lot of stress and anxiety. Stress level has dramatically increased throughout the world recently.

We need to find ways to develop an economy in which people can be more interdependent. This is not to minimize the importance of individual responsibility. We need to assume the responsibility to stand on our own feet, but at the same time we need to be willing to support those around us if they fail to stand on their own. Later when we fail to stand on our own, those around us will be willing to offer us their support.

Conclusion
Our is a world in which people are discriminated based on class difference, and one in which an individualistic economy is replacing a community one. In India we don't feel a joint responsibility toward what we own jointly such as our roads and our government. The belief that God is all-owning has the power to effectively root out the class discrimination and to help us feel responsible toward what we own in common. It might also help us to develop an economy in which we are more interdependent rather than fully self-dependent.