Wednesday, May 20, 2026

When Teachers Become Targets

The Stories of Samuel Paty and T. J. Joseph — and the Lessons Humanity Must Learn

In two different parts of the world — France and Kerala — two teachers became victims of violent religious extremism.


One was murdered in the street.
The other survived after his hand was cut off.

Though separated by geography and culture, the stories of Samuel Paty and T. J. Joseph reveal disturbing similarities about fanaticism, fear, mob outrage, and the fragility of civilized society.

These are not merely isolated crimes.
They are warnings.


1. Samuel Paty: A Teacher Killed for a Classroom Discussion

Samuel Paty was a history teacher in France. In October 2020, while teaching a lesson on freedom of expression, he showed cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad that had previously appeared in the magazine Charlie Hebdo. Before doing so, he reportedly warned students that some might find the images offensive and allowed them to look away if they wished.

A false narrative soon spread online. A student who had not even attended the class falsely accused Paty of targeting Muslim students. The accusation was amplified on social media by activists and religious extremists.

Days later, an 18-year-old Islamist extremist tracked Paty near his school and beheaded him in public.

France was shocked.
A teacher had been killed not for violence, but for conducting a discussion inside a classroom.

The incident became a defining moment in debates about free speech, secularism, religious extremism, and the growing power of online hatred.


2. T. J. Joseph: A Professor Mutilated in Kerala

A decade earlier, in 2010, college professor T. J. Joseph from Kerala became the victim of another horrific act.

Joseph, a Malayalam professor at Newman College, prepared an examination paper containing a literary passage that some Islamist groups interpreted as insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

Soon outrage spread.
Religious groups demanded punishment.

On July 4, 2010, while returning home from church with his family, Joseph was attacked by extremists linked to the Popular Front of India (PFI). His right hand was chopped off in broad daylight.

He survived after multiple surgeries.

But the physical violence was only part of the tragedy.

Joseph later described how he experienced social isolation, public humiliation, financial ruin, and abandonment by institutions that should have protected him. His wife later died by suicide under severe emotional and financial strain.

Like Samuel Paty, he became a symbol of what can happen when religious outrage overwhelms humanity.


3. The Disturbing Similarities

The two events followed a strikingly similar pattern.

(a) An accusation of blasphemy

Neither case began with physical violence.
It began with the perception that a religious boundary had been crossed.

(b) Public outrage and amplification

In both cases, anger spread rapidly through communities and networks.

In France, social media campaigns targeted Samuel Paty.
In Kerala, organized protests and extremist mobilization escalated the hostility against Joseph.

(c) Dehumanization

Once individuals are portrayed as enemies of religion, they stop being seen as human beings.

The teacher becomes a “blasphemer.”
The professor becomes an “enemy.”

At that point, violence becomes psychologically easier.

(d) Fear and silence

Perhaps the most troubling aspect is how many people remain silent out of fear.

When societies become afraid to defend truth, extremism grows stronger.


4. The Deeper Problem: When Religion Loses Compassion

Religion, at its best, should deepen compassion, humility, and reverence for life.

But when religion becomes fused with fanaticism, identity politics, or collective anger, it can produce the opposite:

  • hatred instead of compassion,
  • punishment instead of mercy,
  • fear instead of wisdom,
  • tribal loyalty instead of truth.

This is not unique to one religion alone.
History shows that every religion can become dangerous when certainty overwhelms humanity.

The problem is not sincere faith.
The problem is absolutism — the belief that protecting religious honor is more important than protecting human life.

Once that mentality takes root, violence can begin to appear sacred.


5. The Failure of Society

Both events also expose failures beyond the attackers themselves.

Failure of institutions

Teachers and intellectuals should feel protected in civilized societies.
Instead, both men were left vulnerable.

Failure of public courage

Many people privately oppose extremism but remain publicly silent.

Fear allows fanaticism to dominate the public space.

Failure of social media culture

Digital outrage can transform misunderstanding into mass hatred within hours.

Falsehood spreads faster than wisdom.

Failure of religious leadership

Religious leaders have a responsibility to calm emotions, defend justice, and uphold human dignity.

When leaders encourage outrage — or fail to resist it — society becomes more dangerous.


6. The Central Lesson

The greatest lesson from these tragedies is simple:

No idea, belief, doctrine, prophet, scripture, or ideology should become more sacred than human life itself.

A civilization survives not because everyone agrees, but because people refuse to kill, mutilate, or destroy one another over disagreement.

Freedom of expression must coexist with wisdom and sensitivity.
But disagreement or offense can never justify violence.

The moment a society accepts violence in defense of belief, fear replaces freedom.

And when fear rules, truth becomes impossible.


7. What Humanity Must Choose

The stories of Samuel Paty and T. J. Joseph force humanity to confront a difficult question:

Will religion help human beings become more compassionate?
Or will religious identity become another force of division and fear?

The future of civilization may depend on the answer.

A healthy society must defend simultaneously:

  • freedom of thought,
  • dignity of persons,
  • religious coexistence,
  • and nonviolence.

Without these foundations, democracy weakens, education suffers, and ordinary people begin to live in fear.


Conclusion

Samuel Paty lost his life.
T. J. Joseph lost his hand and much of his former life.

Both paid a terrible price for living in societies where religious outrage became stronger than human compassion.

Their stories should not merely provoke anger.
They should provoke self-examination.

Because the true measure of a civilization is not how passionately it defends its beliefs, but how humanely it treats those with whom it disagrees.

Not Everyone Who Says ‘Lord, Lord’

Jesus’ Message and the Formation of Christianity — A Critical Reflection

Jesus Christ spoke some of the most challenging words in religious history when he said:

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.”

This statement strikes at the heart of Christian spirituality.
Is the Kingdom of God based primarily on believing certain things about Jesus?
Or is it based on a transformation in the way human beings live?

A close reading of Jesus’ teachings suggests that his emphasis was not on doctrinal belief about himself, but on living in accordance with the will of God.


1. The Central Theme of Jesus’ Message: The Kingdom of God

Jesus began his public ministry with a simple proclamation:

“The Kingdom of God is near. Repent.”

What is remarkable is that Jesus did not begin by announcing a new religion or demanding theological belief about his identity.
Instead, he called people into a new way of being.

The “Kingdom of God” was not merely about heaven after death.
It referred to a reality in which God’s will becomes active within human life.

Its signs are:

  • love,
  • compassion,
  • justice,
  • forgiveness,
  • purity of heart,
  • humility,
  • reconciliation,
  • and human solidarity.

This is why Jesus taught:

  • “Love your enemies.”
  • “Do not judge.”
  • “Forgive.”
  • “The greatest among you must be your servant.”

The center of his teaching was not religious identity, but transformed living.


2. Calling Jesus “Lord” and Jesus’ Own Warning

Even during Jesus’ lifetime, many people began calling him “Lord.”
The Greek term Kyrios and the Hebrew/Aramaic equivalent Adonai carried connotations of authority, reverence, and at times divine significance.

But what is important is this: Jesus himself did not make verbal confession the basis of entering the Kingdom of God.

Instead, he warned:

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father.”

This distinction is crucial.
Believing exalted things about Jesus is not the same as living according to the will of God.

A person may:

  • call Jesus divine,
  • yet hate fellow human beings;
  • proclaim Jesus as Lord,
  • yet live unjustly;
  • participate in worship,
  • yet lack mercy and compassion.

Jesus rejects such spirituality.

For him, what matters is inner transformation expressed through the fruits of one’s life.


3. From Spiritual Movement to Religious System

After Jesus’ death, various beliefs about him developed over time.

He was understood as:

  • a prophet,
  • the Messiah,
  • the Son of God,
  • the cosmic Lord.

This historical development is understandable. Human societies often interpret great spiritual figures in increasingly exalted ways.

However, a significant shift gradually occurred:

the focus moved from the message proclaimed by Jesus to beliefs about Jesus himself.

As a result:

  • the question “How should we live?” was increasingly replaced by
  • “What must we believe about Jesus?”

This shift marks the transition from a spiritual movement into an organized religion.


4. The Nature and Risks of Religious Systems

When religions become institutionalized, certain tendencies often emerge:

(a) Group Identity

Humanity becomes divided into “us” and “them.”

(b) Doctrinal Centralization

Correct belief becomes more important than transformed living.

(c) Institutional Self-Preservation

Religious institutions begin protecting themselves and their authority.

(d) Competition

Religions compete for numbers, influence, and cultural dominance.

At this stage, religion can slowly move away from the spirit of its founder.

Christian history, like the history of many religions, contains examples of this process.


5. Jesus’ Universal Vision of Humanity

The teachings and actions of Jesus reveal a profoundly universal vision.

In the parable of the Good Samaritan, the true neighbor is not the religious insider, but the outsider despised by society.

Jesus praises the faith of Romans and interacts freely with sinners, tax collectors, and social outcasts.

These actions reveal a consistent truth:

the Kingdom of God does not belong to a religious tribe.

God is the Father of all humanity.
Therefore all human beings are fundamentally brothers and sisters.

Jesus’ vision transcended religious boundaries and pointed toward a universal human family rooted in divine love.


6. Is Believing “Jesus Is God” Enough?

This becomes one of the most important spiritual questions.

If someone believes Jesus is divine but lives without:

  • love,
  • compassion,
  • justice,
  • humility,
  • or forgiveness,

what spiritual value does that belief ultimately have?

According to Jesus’ own teaching, the measure of spiritual authenticity is not verbal confession, but the fruits of one’s life.

“You will know them by their fruits.”

If belief about Jesus does not lead a person into the character of God, it risks becoming merely a religious identity rather than genuine spiritual transformation.


7. The Contemporary Relevance

Today, Christianity — like many religions — often appears deeply occupied with:

  • defending doctrine,
  • preserving institutional power,
  • increasing membership,
  • and competing culturally or politically.

In such a situation, Jesus’ original call must be heard again:

“Love one another.”

The heart of Jesus’ message was not the creation of another religion competing among religions.
It was the emergence of a new humanity transformed by the love of God.


Conclusion

At its core, Jesus’ message was not primarily a doctrine to be believed, but a life to be lived.

He called human beings:

  • to return to God,
  • to live in love,
  • to recognize one another as brothers and sisters,
  • and to undergo an inner rebirth.

It is easy to call Jesus “Lord.”
It is far more difficult to walk in the way of love that he embodied.

That is why Jesus’ warning remains deeply relevant:

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.”