The Two Views of Quran

Scholars’ view:

Many Islamic scholars (especially modern ones) divide Quranic verses into two categories:

1. Universal / timeless principles (e.g., justice, mercy, prayer, monotheism).

2. Context-specific instructions (e.g., wartime commands, tribal treaties, slavery laws).

This approach is similar to how Christians interpret the Old Testament: some laws are eternal (love God, love neighbor), others were for a particular time (dietary laws, ritual sacrifices).

Common Muslim view:

For most ordinary Muslims, the Quran is seen as entirely timeless and directly from Allah — every verse must apply to all people, all times, in its plain sense.

This “flat reading” often leads to confusion: how to reconcile verses about mercy with verses about violence?

2. Why This Problem Exists

The Quran itself does not clearly label which verses are timeless and which are contextual.

The doctrine of inerrancy (that every word is perfect and eternal) makes it emotionally hard for many Muslims to admit that some verses were temporary.

Political groups (past and present) use the literalist approach to justify power, conquest, or resistance.

3. Possible Ways Forward

(a) Education in Contextual Reading

Widespread teaching of asbāb al-nuzūl (circumstances of revelation).

Example: “Kill them wherever you find them” (Q 9:5) is explained as applying to a specific broken treaty in Medina, not to every non-Muslim forever.

If Muslims learn the why behind a verse, they can better distinguish its scope.

(b) Principle-Based Hermeneutics

Teach that the Quran’s timeless principles are justice, mercy, dignity of human life (Q 5:32), no compulsion in religion (Q 2:256).

Contextual verses should be read through these higher principles.

This is already how reformist scholars argue.

(c) Acknowledging Abrogation (Naskh) Honestly

Traditional doctrine of abrogation says some verses cancelled others.

Instead of using this to elevate “harsher” verses (as radicals do), scholars can emphasize that peaceful verses reflect the final spirit of the Quran.

(d) Developing a Modern “Usul al-Fiqh” (method of law)

Just as Christian theologians reinterpreted slavery or war passages, Muslims can develop updated methodologies.

For example: slavery verses are acknowledged as historical, not applicable today. The same method could apply to verses about conquest.

(e) Dialogue within the Muslim community

Imams, teachers, and writers need courage to say: “Yes, not every verse is a command for all time. Some were for then.”

This breaks the fear that contextual interpretation = rejecting the Quran.

4. Challenges

Literalists accuse contextual readers of “watering down Islam.”

Many Muslims feel that admitting context-specific verses undermines the Quran’s divinity.

Reform requires both scholarly courage and grassroots teaching so ordinary Muslims understand.

📌 Summary

The tension comes from the gap between scholarly awareness that parts of the Quran were for a specific historical setting, and popular belief that all verses apply equally for all time. The solution lies in:

Promoting contextual education,

Highlighting universal principles,

Updating methods of interpretation,

Encouraging open dialogue.

This way, Muslims can honor the Quran’s message without being trapped by 7th-century tribal rules.